Archive for June, 2009

Pink Triangle, Monument to Gay Holocaust Victims, Burned by Arsonists.

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

There’s not much to say about this other than I’m not at all surprised, particularly in the wake of Proposition 8, though I’m thoroughly disgusted. This is a Holocaust memorial. Is there nothing actually sacred to these bigots? (Purely rhetorical question.)


San Francisco fire officials said Monday that the weekend burning of a large fabric triangle, spread on the Twin Peaks hillside during the city’s gay pride celebration each year, was arson.

“Officially it is an intentionally set fire,” said fire department spokeswoman Lt. Mindy Talmadge.

“There is an active criminal investigation,” she added, but said no arrests had been made as of Monday evening.

…..

The early Sunday morning fire was reported around 5 a.m. near Christmas Tree Point Road.

It burned about 25 to 30 feet of the massive Pink Triangle before being extinguished about a half-hour later.

The triangle, which has been displayed during the Pride Parade in San Francisco each year since 1995, pays tribute to the gay victims of the Holocaust and others who have suffered discrimination.

 

News Briefs

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

Various headlines from everywhere.

 
Gay bar patrons not targeted by officers, chief says
All the usual tripe. “We went there because they were a bunch of drunks. They made gay passes at us. He just walked into my night stick, I swear.”

Obama urges lesbian, gay patience overturning ‘unjust laws’
Obama makes pretty words and tells us to keep on waiting, as usual.

Court throws out ban on exposing children to gays
Georgia Supreme Court is living in 21st century unlike lower court. Gay parents and friends won’t actually give children Teh Gay.


Neo-Nazis are in the Army now

Sharing the baracks, trenches or showers with a law-abiding, highly qualiified gay/lesbian soldier? EEEEW! Sharing them with Neo-Nazis and ex-felons? No problem.

Atheists as Unusually Moral?
Yeah, we’ve been saying this all along but let a Pagan tell you now.

Don’t leave clergy alone with children: report
Finally someone figured it out. All that screaming they do about gay people molesting children–it’s projection.

Could Proposition 8 happen in Canada?
These days I wouldn’t be surprised by anything. They have Alberta, after all, which is chock full of Mormons.

It’s Baaackkk: ENDA!
“Traditional Values” Coalition displays their Christian love by calling a transgender man a “she-male”.


Judge Upholds Start Date of D.C. Gay Marriage Law

D.C. to uphold law. Bigots apoplectic.

American Atheists to lower membership fees
In light of the struggling economy and in an effort to boost membership American Atheists has reduced membership fees. Individual memberships are now $20 (formerly $40) and family memberships are $35 (formerly $60).

 

Faces of Hate / Jesus Loves Me

Monday, June 29th, 2009

More RRRW Christianist “love” for LGBT people caught on tape at Sacramento Pride (June 20, 2009) .



 

“On the anniversary of Stonewall, remember we must still fight “

Monday, June 29th, 2009

A very enlightening guest post by Danielle Truszovsky on Latter Day Chino:

…..
On their website, NOM states they have a 501(c)(4) nonprofit status, which means that the group is a “Social Welfare Organization” without restrictions on lobbying expenditures. When I searched for the organization using Guidestar (the leading nonprofit research database), however, no such 501(c)(4) shows up. Instead the National Organization for MarriageInc shows up with a 501(c)(12) status which is for “Local Benevolent Life Insurance Associations, Mutual Irrigation and Telephone Companies, and Like Co.” It seems this organization is intentionally misrepresenting itself.

…..

Also strange is that this office was previously inhabited by a right-wing organization called the Witherspoon Institute, which according to the Opus Dei Awareness Network (ODAN) is an “Opus Dei-affiliated foundation.” Opus Dei is the secretive sect within the Catholic Church, with direct ties to the Vatican, that reportedly has billions of dollars in assets. They were made famous by the villain in “The Da Vinci Code,” who was a devout member of Opus Dei, albeit an uncharacteristically murderous one.

…..

NOM has more than one tie to a controversial religious sect. Another founding member of the group was Matthew Holland, who is a professor at Brigham Young University. His father is a member of the Quorum of 12 Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. This “Quorum” represents the governing body of the LDS church. The Mormon and Opus Dei connection comes together beautifully in NOM’s “Gathering Storm” ad campaign, and it appears that at least 3 of the “actors” in the commercial are Mormons and at least 1 is a member of Opus Dei.

…..

On March 25, 2009 Californians Against Hate requested copies of NOM’s IRS 990 tax return forms. Federal law requires non-profits release this information within 30 days. It is nearly 90 days after the initial request and still NOM has failed to release their tax forms and are currently accruing IRS fines of $20 per day until their financials are released to the public. What are they trying to hide?

Although NOM is continuing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on ad campaigns across the country, no one knows where this money is coming from. They are the only national organization working to deny gay Americans equal rights and their operating practices are suspect. Considering the Board’s obvious ties to the Mormon Church and Opus Dei—is it possible that the only nationalized effort against gay civil rights is merely a front group for controversial religious organizations in an attempt to force their religious ideology on the American public?
…..

 
Related posts:
Why Doesn’t the IRS Have Any Record of the National Organization for Marriage?
NOM is Trying So Hard to Get Our Attention, We Owe It to Them to See What They Want
National Organization for Marriage Yes On 8 Donor Filings for January 30, 2009


 

Stonewall Riots; June 27, 1969.

Saturday, June 27th, 2009

Today marks the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall Riots, commonly considered the genesis of the official Gay Rights Movement. The riots were a series of demonstrations by patrons of Manhattan’s Stonewall Inn, who had finally had enough of police harassment and government- sponsored oppression. I went by the Stonewall Inn when I visited New York earlier this year. It’s a very unimposing place and doesn’t seem like the stuff of legends, but it is nonetheless.

It was on the one year anniversary of the Stonewall Riots that the first Pride Parade and celebrations were held in L.A. and New York, and such celebrations have been held each subsequent year. Each June LGBT people across the nation come together to throw off the shackles of bigotry and oppression, commemorate Stonewall and other historic events, and engage in myriad festivities.

Here’s to the brave souls who fought at Stonewall, in every battle since, and every battle yet to come. One way or another the bigots will lose this, even if it takes another forty years, or more.

 

 
For more on the Stonewall Riots:
The Stonewall Riots - 1969 — A Turning Point in the Struggle for Gay and Lesbian Liberation

A History of Gay and Lesbian Pride -The Stonewall Riots

Images From the Stonewall Uprising’s Final Night

Gay Rights Movement: 40 Years Since Stonewall Riots

 

 

Disturbing Vintage Ads.

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Some vintage ads make us wax nostalgic. Others make us cringe. Some even have us wondering how such deranged individuals got hired as ad execs and slipped their work past the censors.

 
She broke 14 nails cleaning her old stove? How many fingers does she have?


 
Poor Mabel is experiencing menopause. Let’s drug her into oblivion so she’ll stop being such a nuisance to others.


 
I wonder what happens if she buys the “wrong” brand of bacon….


 
It’s nice to have a girl around the house. A good doormat is an absolute necessity.


 
Hubby lock you out of the bedroom over “feminine hygiene” issues? Douche with Lysol.


 
Because a woman should never let a thing like pregnancy get in the way of her “wifely duties”. Bring on the drugs!


 

The rest I post with no comment other than WTF?!? .



 


 


 


 



 


 

“Three major myths about marriage. “

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

Another excellent piece by Classically Liberal. It refutes three of the major myths disseminated about marriage in their efforts to deny it to same-sex couples.

Myth #1

Marriage has not always been about one man and one woman. History is filled with accounts of polygamy. Some of the most fanatical defenders of “traditional marriage,” the Mormons, are themselves frequently descendants of polygamists. Mormonism taught polygamy and condemned the “one man, one woman” concept of marriage.

…..

There has never been a time when marriage was exclusive limited to “one man and one woman.”
…..
Myth #2

It is claimed that marriage has always been between individuals of the opposite sex. Christians, in particular, are known to make this pronouncement with utter assurance. Yet this simply is not true.

Consider that the Christian emperor of Rome, Theodosius II, created a code of Christian law for the Roman Empire. In that code he specifically banned same-sex marriage. Why? Why ban something that was never practiced? In fact it was practiced and it was well known.

One historian writes:

Marriages between males or between females were legal and familiar among the upper classes. Even under the Republic, as has been noted, Cicero regard the younger Curio’s relationship with another man as a marriage, and by the time of the early Empire references to gay marriages are commonplace. The biographer of Elagabalus maintains that after the emperor’s marriage to an athlete from Smyrna, any male who wished to advance at the imperial court either had to have a husband or pretend that he did. Martial and Juvenal both mention public ceremonies involving the families, dowries and legal niceties.
…..
Myth #3

Many on the religious right claim that marriage was a “divine institution” all along and that the state took control of marriage from the church.

This is utterly false. Marriage was neither connected to the church or to the state for much of human history. A marriage basically amounted to two individuals announcing their marriage to friends and family and setting up house. There may have been a “wedding feast” as depicted in the New Testament but there was no church ceremony. Early Christian churches had nothing to do with marriage. They did not perform marriages.

The first attempt by the Christian sect to take control of marriage was in 1545 when the Council of Trent announced that marriages would no longer be recognized as valid unless a priest performed them with two witnesses present. Prior to that a marriage was considered valid if two individuals merely pledged themselves to one another, regardless if anyone else knew about the matter. Martin Luther went further than Calvin and said marriage was “of the earthly kingdom” and “subject to the prince, not to the Pope.”
…..
The state did not take over marriage. First, marriage was entirely private without interference of either church or state. Catholicism started to exert control over marriage in 1545 and then the Protestant Reformations demanded that the state take ultimate control over marriage. Of course, they assumed the state would be under their control at the time. Certainly when Calvin pushed his detailed regulations of marriage onto the law books in Geneva he was, for all intents and purposes, the ruler of that poor city.
…..

 
And while I’m at it:

 
When Same-Sex Marriage Was A Christian Rite

A Kiev art museum contains a curious icon from St. Catherine’s Monastery on Mt. Sinai in Israel. It shows two robed Christian saints. Between them is a traditional Roman ‘pronubus’ (a best man), overseeing a wedding. The pronubus is Christ. The married couple are both men.
…..
While the pairing of saints, particularly in the early Christian church, was not unusual, the association of these two men was regarded as particularly intimate. Severus, the Patriarch of Antioch (AD 512 - 518) explained that, “we should not separate in speech they [Sergius and Bacchus] who were joined in life”. This is not a case of simple “adelphopoiia.” In the definitive 10th century account of their lives, St. Sergius is openly celebrated as the “sweet companion and lover” of St. Bacchus. Sergius and Bacchus’s close relationship has led many modern scholars to believe they were lovers. But the most compelling evidence for this view is that the oldest text of their martyrology, written in New Testament Greek describes them as “erastai,” or “lovers”. In other words, they were a male homosexual couple. Their orientation and relationship was not only acknowledged, but it was fully accepted and celebrated by the early Christian church, which was far more tolerant than it is today.

Contrary to myth, Christianity’s concept of marriage has not been set in stone since the days of Christ, but has constantly evolved as a concept and ritual.
…..
Such same gender Christian sanctified unions also took place in Ireland in the late 12thand/ early 13th century, as the chronicler Gerald of Wales (‘Geraldus Cambrensis’) recorded.
…..
Another 14th century Serbian Slavonic “Office of the Same Sex Union”, uniting two men or two women, had the couple lay their right hands on the Gospel while having a crucifix placed in their left hands. After kissing the Gospel, the couple were then required to kiss each other, after which the priest, having raised up the Eucharist, would give them both communion.

Records of Christian same sex unions have been discovered in such diverse archives as those in the Vatican, in St. Petersburg, in Paris, in Istanbul and in the Sinai, covering a thousand-years from the 8th to the 18th century.
…..
While homosexuality was technically illegal from late Roman times, homophobic writings didn’t appear in Western Europe until the late 14th century. Even then, church-consecrated same sex unions continued to take place.
…..

 

“Anniversaries bittersweet for gays who wed last year.”

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Bittersweet indeed. My wife and I have debated our first anniversary in the wake of Proposition 8. While we originally had planned to have a party it no longer feels right. We’re official second class citizens, and a very strange breed of second class citizens at that. It would feel odd celebrating that, and downright rude doing so considering how many third-class citizens there are who don’t have access to what limited rights we do.

Joseph Weems and Randall Won celebrated their first anniversary with a low-key weekend barbecue for friends at their Land Park home. Ellen Pontac and Shelly Bailes sipped mango mimosas, then took a walk around Davis and had a quiet dinner. Laurie Warren and Seanain Snow didn’t celebrate at all.

“Until everybody who wants to has the legal right to marry, it’s a very small token to us that our marriage is legal,” said Snow, 39, a stay-at-home mom who lives in Davis.

A bittersweet season of first anniversaries began last week for an estimated 18,000 same-sex couples across California, married during what turned out to be a five-month legal window before voters passed Proposition 8 in November.

For the state’s gay and lesbian couples, getting married depends more on the courts and the electorate than on romantic proposals and elaborate wedding plans.
…..
Vermont, which legalized civil unions in 2000, recently passed legislation sanctioning same-sex marriage, as did Maine and New Hampshire. Gay and lesbian marriage is also legal in Connecticut, Massachusetts and Iowa. New York and Washington, D.C., recognize same-sex ceremonies performed elsewhere.
…..

While we may end up having a small get-together with a few friends it won’t be nearly what we’d hoped for thanks to Proposition 8 and the intolerance of people who insist on forcing their hatred into law. Ultimately if California doesn’t undo this hideous mess one way or another we’ll head east when feasible and leave CA to the bigots. I’ll gladly marry my wife as many times as it takes, in as many places as it takes. Eventually we’ll have a real anniversary party, when the time is right.

 

Faith Cakes, Atheists and Puppets…Oh My!

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Sound strange? It’s not really. It’s just a collection of great videos I discovered recently on YouTube.



 

Neda, and a Death Seen Around the World.

Sunday, June 21st, 2009

While this is my first post on the current events in Iran I have been following the situation. There’s so much happening there and so many stories to tell but this one, in particular, struck me. Her name is believed to have been Neda, which translates into “the call” in Farsi, and she was brutally murdered in the streets during a protest in Tehran. ***Warning: Stories and videos contain graphic content (descriptions and depictions of real-life violence). ***

Huffington Post: Iran Updates : Live-Blogging The Uprising

…..
2:23 PM ET — Neda before she was shot. A reader forwards this video showing Neda (in the black shirt and blue jeans) and her father (blue striped shirt) during the rally. Another reader sends an unconfirmed report of a memorial service for Neda planned for tomorrow at 5PM at Niloufar mosque at Abas Abad, Tehran.

…..
10:27 AM ET — What Neda’s father said. The image of Neda, a young Iranian woman, being shot and killed in the streets yesterday has become a rallying cry for Iranian reformists and their allies internationally. If you haven’t seen the video, I’m reposting it below, but please be warned, it is very very graphic.

A reader who couldn’t quite make out what her father was saying in the video understood after learning that her name is Neda. He sent in the transcript: “Neda, don’t be afraid. Neda, don’t be afraid. (There is yelling and screaming.) Neda, stay with me. Neda stay with me!”

Time: In Iran, One Woman’s Death May Have Many Consequences

Iran’s revolution has now run through a full cycle. A gruesomely captivating video of a young woman — laid out on a Tehran street after apparently being shot, blood pouring from her mouth and then across her face — swept Twitter, Facebook and other websites this weekend. The woman rapidly became a symbol of Iran’s escalating crisis, from a political confrontation to far more ominous physical clashes. Some sites refer to her as “Neda,” Farsi for the voice or the call. Tributes that incorporate startlingly upclose footage of her dying have started to spring up on YouTube.

Although it is not yet clear who shot “Neda” (a soldier? pro-government militant? an accidental misfiring?), her death may have changed everything. For the cycles of mourning in Shiite Islam actually provide a schedule for political combat — a way to generate or revive momentum. Shiite Muslims mourn their dead on the third, seventh and 40th days after a death, and these commemorations are a pivotal part of Iran’s rich history. During the revolution, the pattern of confrontations between the shah’s security forces and the revolutionaries often played out in 40-day cycles.
…..
“Neda” is already being hailed as a martyr, a second important concept in Shiism. With the reported deaths of 19 people Saturday, martyrdom also provides a potent force that could further deepen public anger at Iran’s regime.
…..
Because of Hussein, revolt against tyranny became part of Shiite tradition. Indeed, protest and martyrdom are widely considered duties to God. And nowhere is the practice more honored than in Iran, the world’s largest Shiite country.

The revolutionaries exploited the deep passion about martyrdom as well as the timetable of Shiite mourning in whipping up greater opposition to Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi. With the deaths of “Neda” and others, they may now find the same phenomena used against them.

 
Regrettably it’s likely Neda is among the first of many to lose their lives in this revolution.