Protesters, ACLU ruin our reputation (so says Robert Strong)
I am getting tired of hearing about and seeing all of these protests about the passing of Proposition 8. We are a government “Of the People, For the People, and By the People.” Supporters of Proposition 8 used the system the way it was meant to be used. So, if it angers anyone that it passed, why waste energy with protests? Aren’t they capable of getting a measure on a ballot? Or do they not attempt another ballot measure because they fear the outcome? Are they taking a shortcut by yelling in the streets and acting like idiots?
To begin with, that ballot measure should never have happened. Human rights are not something to be put to a popular vote. Anybody who disagrees should be the first to put their rights to “the will of the people”. Next, Mr. Strong would you consider these people to be “acting like idiots”?

Furthermore, they are yelling at the Mormon Church, for crying out loud. I have seen posters from protesters stating “Separation of Church and State.” How can they ask for separation of church and state when they are demanding to be addressed as a “married” couple, knowing the term “marriage” comes from religion? I’m not a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but I at least know that it is not the root of the issue.
Marriage does not come from religion. Religion (Christianity in particular) likes to claim it owns marriage, but it doesn’t. Marriage has existed around the world in every culture both within and without religion. It has been between a man and a woman, a man and multiple women, a woman and multiple men and even people of the same gender (yes, same-sex marriage has existed historically). The “one-man, one-woman” marriage hasn’t existed since time immemorial as much as some would like to have us think.
Marriage is a civil contract. Brigham Young himself said that. Millions of people get married every year without a single tie to a religious group, without the aid of a clergy person, without reference to any deity(s). People need to face the fact that not everybody gets married in a church, nor do they need or want to. Likewise the approval of a church is not required for people to get married, though many churches think they have the right to determine who can get married.
Likewise, I am getting mad at groups such as the ACLU for supporting an effort to overturn Proposition 8. The ACLU’s very name — American Civil Liberties Union — implies that it stands for civil liberties for all Americans, right? Apparently not, if it supports the overturning of Proposition 8. A majority of voters exercised their civil liberties by passing the measure. To step in and violate voters’ civil rights for a second time only invites people like me to further exercise my civil liberties and file a class-action lawsuit against them for violating my rights as a voter.
Knock yourself out, Robert. I’m sure they’ll be laughing along with me. If you consider eradicating the constitutionally guaranteed civil rights of others one of your civil liberties you have serious issues. But go ahead and file that class-action lawsuit.
The ACLU got away with this a few years ago with Proposition 187. How it has managed thus far without going bankrupt from being sued for violating civil rights and liberties is beyond me.
Ah, so you’re a racist as well as a gaycist. I’ve noticed they tend to go together. Now I know. You would have said MLK and those who marched with him were “acting like idiots”.
Grow up, Robert. Your fantasy world where only straight white Christians exist is just that; a fantasy world.
Now from
Locals Protest California’s Prop 8 one particular sentence stands out:
Church groups supporting Proposition 8 say they voted to ban gay marriage in California, but did not target any group.
Let’s see. Proposition 8 read:
ELIMINATES RIGHT OF SAME–SEX COUPLES TO MARRY. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
* Changes the California Constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry in California.
* Provides that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.
Please explain to me how that is not targeted at any one group. Of course my brain is not a pretzel so I can’t figure it out, but perhaps one of the pretzel-brains can explain to me how ELIMINATES RIGHT OF SAME–SEX COUPLES TO MARRY doesn’t target one group.
Now a message to those who are telling us to stop protesting, end the boycotts and be nice little fags…
No. H*ll no. We’re not your sheep whom you can direct like Stepford-wives. We are not going to do whatever you say just because you tell us to. (Yes, I know that scares the stuffing out of you but deal with it.) You will no longer shame us into submission by wagging your fingers and saying we’re naughty. You’ve gone too far and we’re not going to take it any more.