Wichita Mother gets Life Sentence for Prostituting Small Daughter to Neighbor.
Sunday, October 4th, 2009The RRRWers insist they should be able to prevent us from marrying (among other things) “for the sake of the children”. Perhaps there should be regulations regarding who can and cannot procreate. Just because one has functioning reproductive organs and is willing to have unprotected sex that doesn’t necessarily mean they should procreate and raise children. * The millions of children abused and/or neglected by their parents could testify to that. Case in point:
WICHITA — A Wichita woman convicted of prostituting her small daughter to a neighbor received a life prison sentence this morning.
The man charged with paying for sex with the child also received a life sentence.
The mother and her friend Reggie Stafford were each convicted of two counts of rape and one of aggravated criminal sodomy. The mother was convicted of aiding and abetting the sex crimes.
During a trial in August, the girl testified that when she was between the ages of 5 and 6, her mother would take her to Stafford’s house, near where they lived in the Planeview neighborhood, and he would have sex with the young girl.
…..
Sedgwick County District Judge Greg Waller ran the mother’s life sentences concurrently, meaning the 48-year-old won’t be eligible for parole for 25 years.But the judge made Stafford’s sentences consecutive, meaning the 52-year-old will likely die in prison. Under the law, he will not be able to face a parole board for 75 years.
Waller pointed to evidence he would not admit at trial that showed that Stafford had sex with the woman’s other two daughters when they were children. They are now grown. He could not be charged with those crimes, because the statute of limitations had run out. But Waller could consider the evidence during the sentencing.
…..
Raising a child is serious business. Children are under their parent’s care, either directly or indirectly, 24/7 for 18 years. There is a great deal of damage a parent can do to a child in that amount of time. Yet we currently do nothing to determine if a person is fit for such a task. We only wait until they prove they aren’t, sometimes giving them multiple chances. Only after the damage–potentially irreversible damage–is done to the child(ren) do we take action.
Am I actually suggesting we restrict who can have children? Of course not. I value reproductive freedom. But it’s a travesty that teens and young adults are given no formal education/training in parenting. Such courses could avoid many problems with inexperienced parents (just because you can reproduce doesn’t mean you know what do do after–it’s not innate knowledge) and flag potential problems before they occur.
*Or as Tod says in Parenthood, “You know, Mrs. Buckman, you need a license to buy a dog, to drive a car - hell, you even need a license to catch a fish. But they’ll let any butt-reaming ***hole be a father.”





