Archive for the ‘Vermont’ Category

Invitation to “Opposite Marriage” Couples in MA, CT, IA and VT.

Friday, September 25th, 2009

Same-sex marriage, we’ve been told countless times by opponents, will have devastating consequences on “traditional” (man and woman) marriage. We’re never told exactly what those consequences are, we’re just told it will happen. Same-sex marriage, allegedly, will destroy the sacred institution of man/woman marriage, which is one of the reasons it cannot be legalized.

Same-sex marriage has been legal for nearly six years in MA and just about one year in CT. Same-sex couples have been marrying for five months in Iowa and several weeks in VT. Same-sex marriages were also legal for an all too brief period last year in CA. I have yet to hear of any “opposite marriages” being destroyed in the wake of the tens of thousands of same-sex marriages that have occurred in these states, but I’m willing to admit I may have missed something out there.

So this is an open invitation to people who are (or were) in man/woman marriages in MA, CT, IA and VT (or even CA). If your man/woman marriage was destroyed by same-sex couples being granted marriage equality please let the world know. It would be nice to finally discover, from couples actually affected, what these “consequences” entail.

Comments are open.

 
Update: Please note this invitation is to man/woman couples in the indicated states who believe their marriages were actually affected by legal same-sex marriage, and who want to share their individual stories. It is not an open invitation for people to offer vague hypotheticals about what legal same-sex marriage does/might cause or preach their religious views. If I wanted the latter I could go read the prattlings of Maggie Gallagher. Thank you.

 

Same-Sex Marriages Begin on Tuesday in Vermont.

Sunday, August 30th, 2009

There’s been much furor over the same-sex marriage battles in Maine and Iowa, and the “everything but marriage” fight in Washington. But let’s not forget to celebrate the fact that Vermont will have full marriage equality beginning this Tuesday.

…..
Vermont is the first state to legalize gay marriage legislatively, instead of by court order.
…..

Not exactly. The state legislature of California twice approved same-sex marriage, in 2005 and again in 2007, but Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed it both times.

Vermont’s move comes nine years after the state became the first to offer gay and lesbian couples civil unions at the behest of the Vermont Supreme Court.
…..

Congratulations Vermonters!

 

Same-Sex Marriage = Religious Freedom.

Sunday, April 19th, 2009

The bigots scream endlessly that we must be denied the rights they take for granted or their “religious freedom” will be trampled. Of course that’s bull on its face for reasons I and others have stated countless times before. But the reality is that by denying us marriage equality they are also denying our religious freedoms. (Yes, many LGBT people are religious whether or not they believe in god(s), and many religious/faith traditions do support same-sex marriage . ) Religious freedom must be provided to all. It cannot merely be granted to the people who have the most money, the most power, and the greatest number of votes .



 
While we’re at it, a little reminder about how Separation of Church and State protects everyone.


 

David Benkof, The RRRW’s Favorite Anti-Gay Gay, Advocates Bigotry Masquerading as Religious Freedom in VT.

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

As you’re likely aware Vermont has provided same-sex couples marriage equality despite the veto efforts of its governor. One thing the law provides is explicit statements, to help coddle the bigots, that churches and other religious groups cannot be forced to marry same-sex couples against their beliefs. This is ridiculous and unnecessary of course because no church has ever been forced to marry any couple against their religious beliefs (Benkof admits in his own diatribe that it would be unconstitutional, but that doesn’t stop the bigots from claiming it will happen in their attempts to prevent marriage equality).

At any rate, David Benkof, who gets some twisted satisfaction out of licking the boots of the very people who’d very much like to see his kind disappear from the planet (for, according to their theology we should be stoned to death in the streets then burn in hell forever) thinks the law doesn’t go far enough. He wants individuals, as well as institutions, to have special protections for their personal bigotries against LGBT people. He cites the same tired examples as all the RRRW hacks. Catholic Charities adoptions, New Mexico photographers, California IVF providers, yadda yadda yadda. OMG, “religious liberties” are being denied because they’re being asked to follow the same laws everybody else has to follow. It’s a travesty of justice!

Why is it that so many people defend the “rights” of these business owners to refuse to serve people who are LGBT while they’d never do so if the owners were refusing to serve the clients because said clients were Christian, black, female, Hispanic, Republican, vegetarian, etc? It is beyond time for institutionalized, legal discrimination against people who are LGBT to end. Blaming it on one’s “deeply held religious beliefs” and begging for corresponding special rights is for pathetic idiots who don’t have the fortitude to just stand up and say “I hate gay people”.

 

NOM Gets Taken to Task.

Friday, April 10th, 2009

The “Gathering Storm” anti-marriage video about which I previously posted has angered quite a few people. Many have written about it and others have created their own videos dismantling the outrageous lies it spews. Here is an excellent effort from bgjohnla:



 
From kellyc01.



 
And as linked in my previous post, bearchewtoy75

It appears the NOM is finally being seen for what they are; group of hysterical hatemongers who seek nothing more than to control everybody with their oppressive, antediluvian dogma. Or perhaps LGBT people and their allies actually learned from Proposition 8 and discovered they need to respond to this sort of garbage swiftly and decisively. Whatever it is, I like what I’m seeing. It seems the pit viper known as NOM is being defanged, slowly but surely.

 

NOM Makes Super Scary Anti-Marriage Video.

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

Now that same-sex marriage is legal in Iowa and Vermont, and D.C. recognizes same-sex marriages from other states, Maggie Gallagher’s National Organization for (Heterosexual) Marriage is in hysterics. They’ve produced this video in hopes that people will contribute money and wet their panties. Same-sex marriage has to be bad; just look at those horrible dark storm clouds in the background!

Oooooh, they’re building a “Rainbow Coalition”. They’re going with the “you guys are so icky every race and religion in the schoolyard is ganging up on you” tactic. Silly bigots keep forgetting, probably because they believe their own propaganda, that we’re not all rich whiteys. LGBT people are from every race, ethnicity and socioeconomic group–just like they are.

It’s sad they’re so pathetic and intolerant that they have to resort to such nonsense to try to keep other people down. If they were secure in their faith and themselves they wouldn’t be engaging in such depravities.

 
Update: Chino Blanco has more on this, including three great videos of the actors trying out for their parts. (No, of course the people weren’t actual doctors, parents, etc. It’s not like their stories were honest either. ) Good As You has an excellent rebuttal to their lies as does bearchewtoy75.

 

James Neiley, Young Marriage Equality Hero.

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

This 17-year-old Vermonter is amazing. Please vote up the video at YouTube if you enjoyed it as much as I did.



 

Experts: Gay Marriage Won’t Hurt Kids.

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

I already knew this of course. But every time I see a story about it I like to put it up since it refutes the lies the bigots spread.

Vermont’s leading mental health and human service organizations joined in support of gay marriage Monday.

The Vermont Psychological Association, the Vermont Psychiatric Association, the Vermont Association of Mental Health Counselors, and the Vermont chapter of the National Association of Social Workers, all say legalizing gay marriage would help the children of same-sex couples. The group says allowing gay couples to marry validates their relationships, could reduce discrimination and increases benefits for the families.

Opponents have argued that gay marriage is detrimental to children. But mental health experts say studies show that’s not true and that opponents are instead misrepresenting studies about divorced parents.

“We felt it was important for us to set the record straight about the scholarly literature in our field and we have lots of different families and the best thing to do for all children is to support parents the best way we can,” said Jackie Weinstein, of UVM Human Development & Families Studies.

….

But the bigots don’t actually care about the children. Children are merely pawns and weapons in their war against LGBT people. They’ll ignore this just like they do all facts.

 
Related posts:

Yes on 8 Site Heavy on Propaganda and Hysteria, Devoid of Facts.

Mississippi Jumps on the “No Gay Adoptions” Bandwagon.

A Message That Bears Repeating.

Sunday, March 30th, 2008

This Letter to the Editor by Sharon Underwood was originally printed in the Valley News (White River Junction, VT/Hanover, NH) in 2000. While the letter is nearly eight years old it’s impact has not lessened over time. It is so powerful on it’s own merits that I cannot add anything to it by way of commentary, so I will simply present it to you now.

Vermont debate brings out the haters
Sunday, April 30, 2000
By SHARON UNDERWOOD
For the Valley News

As the mother of a gay son, I’ve seen firsthand how cruel and misguided people can be.

Many letters have been sent to the Valley News concerning the homosexual menace in Vermont. I am the mother of a gay son and I’ve taken enough from you good people.

I’m tired of your foolish rhetoric about the “homosexual agenda” and your allegations that accepting homosexuality is the same thing as advocating sex with children. You are cruel and ignorant. You have been robbing me of the joys of motherhood ever since my children were tiny.

My firstborn son started suffering at the hands of the moral little thugs from your moral, upright families from the time he was in the first grade. He was physically and verbally abused from first grade straight through high school because he was perceived to be gay.

He never professed to be gay or had any association with anything gay, but he had the misfortune not to walk or have gestures like the other boys. He was called “fag” incessantly, starting when he was 6.

In high school, while your children were doing what kids that age should be doing, mine labored over a suicide note, drafting and redrafting it to be sure his family knew how much he loved them. My sobbing 17-year-old tore the heart out of me as he choked out that he just couldn’t bear to continue living any longer, that he didn’t want to be gay and that he couldn’t face a life with no dignity.

You have the audacity to talk about protecting families and children from the homosexual menace, while you yourselves tear apart families and drive children to despair. I don’t know why my son is gay, but I do know that God didn’t put him, and millions like him, on this Earth to give you someone to abuse. God gave you brains so that you could think, and it’s about time you started doing that.

No choice
At the core of all your misguided beliefs is the belief that this could never happen to you, that there is some kind of subculture out there that people have chosen to join. The fact is that if it can happen to my family, it can happen to yours, and you won’t get to choose. Whether it is genetic or whether something occurs during a critical time of fetal development, I don’t know. I can only tell you with an absolute certainty that it is inborn.

If you want to tout your own morality, you’d best come up with something more substantive than your heterosexuality. You did nothing to earn it; it was given to you. If you disagree, I would be interested in hearing your story, because my own heterosexuality was a blessing I received with no effort whatsoever on my part. It is so woven into the very soul of me that nothing could ever change it.

For those of you who reduce sexual orientation to a simple choice, a character issue, a bad habit or something that can be changed by a 10-step program, I’m puzzled. Are you saying that your own sexual orientation is nothing more than something you have chosen, that you could change it at will?

If that’s not the case, then why would you suggest that someone else can?

A popular theme in your letters is that Vermont has been infiltrated by outsiders. Both sides of my family have lived in Vermont for generations. I am heart and soul a Vermonter, so I’ll thank you to stop saying that you are speaking for “true Vermonters.”

Principles?
You invoke the memory of the brave people who have fought on the battlefield for this great country, saying that they didn’t give their lives so that the “homosexual agenda” could tear down the principles they died defending.

My 83-year-old father fought in some of the most horrific battles of World War II, was wounded and awarded the Purple Heart. He shakes his head in sadness at the life his grandson has had to live. He says he fought alongside homosexuals in those battles, that they did their part and bothered no one. One of his best friends in the service was gay, and he never knew it until the end, and when he did find out, it mattered not at all. That wasn’t the measure of the man.

You religious folk just can’t bear the thought that as my son emerges from the hell that was his childhood he might like to find a lifelong companion and have a measure of happiness. It offends your sensibilities that he should request the right to visit that companion in the hospital, to make medical decisions for him or to benefit from tax laws governing inheritance.

How dare he? you say. These outrageous requests would threaten the very existence of your family, would undermine the sanctity of marriage.

You use religion to abdicate your responsibility to be thinking human beings. There are vast numbers of religious people who find your attitudes repugnant. God is not for the privileged majority, and God knows my son has committed no sin.

The deep-thinking author of a letter to the April 12 Valley News who lectures about homosexual sin and tells us about “those of us who have been blessed with the benefits of a religious upbringing” asks: “What ever happened to the idea of striving . . . to be better human beings than we are?”

Indeed, sir, what ever happened to that?

(Sharon Underwood lives in White River Junction, Vt.)